Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Email this article to a Colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Articles & Searches Download to citation manager Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Articles by Kirmayer, L. J. Articles by Jarvis, G. E. Search for Related Content PubMed Citation Articles by Kirmayer, L. J. Articles by Jarvis, G. E. Cross-Cultural Psychiatry Education, Psychiatrists

Training Clinicians in Cultural Psychiatry: A Canadian Perspective

Received September 2, 2006; revised December 11, 2006, and March 27, 2007; accepted June 18, 2007. The authors are affiliated with the Division of Social and Transcultural Psychiatry of the Department of Psychiatry at McGill University in Montreal, Quebec. Address correspondence to Laurence J. Kirmayer, M.D., Institute of Community and Family Psychiatry, Sir Mortimer B. Davis-Jewish General Hospital, 4333 Côte Ste Catherine Rd., Montreal, Quebec H3T 1E4, Canada; laurence.kirmayer{at}mcgill.ca (e-mail).

OBJECTIVES: The authors summarize the pedagogical approaches and curriculum used in the training of clinicians in cultural psychiatry at the Division of Social and Transcultural Psychiatry, McGill University. METHOD: We reviewed available published and unpublished reports on the history and development of training in cultural psychiatry at McGill to identify the main orientations, teaching methods, curriculum, and course content. Student evaluations of teaching were reviewed. The training strategies and curriculum are related to the larger social context of Canadian society including the history of migration, current demography, and policies of multiculturalism. RESULTS: The McGill program includes core teaching, clinical rotations, an intensive summer program, and annual Advanced Study Institutes. The interdisciplinary training setting emphasizes general knowledge rather than specific ethnocultural groups, including: understanding the cultural assumptions implicit in psychiatric theory and practice; exploring the clinician’s personal and professional identity and social position; evidence-based conceptual frameworks for understanding the interaction of culture and psychopathology; learning to use an expanded version of the cultural formulation in DSM-IV for diagnostic assessment and treatment planning; and developing skills for working with interpreters and culture-brokers, who mediate and interpret the cultural meaning and assumptions of patient and clinician. CONCLUSION: An approach to cultural psychiatry grounded in basic social science perspectives and in trainees’ appreciation of their own background can prepare clinicians to respond effectively to the changing configurations of culture, ethnicity, and identity in contemporary health care settings.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. J. Kirmayer, C. Rousseau, E. Corin, and D. Groleau Training Researchers in Cultural Psychiatry: The McGill-CIHR Strategic Training Program Acad Psychiatry, July 1, 2008; 32(4): 320 - 326. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2008 Academic Psychiatry. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us